Comments:

Introduction

Build 9 — 2 October 2026

Part 1 of The Five Houses of Wandsworth Common


[MOVE - SINCE ABOUT LATE 19TH-CENTURY TERRACES, NOT VILLAS AND MANSIONS]

The richest crop for any field
Is a crop of bricks for it to yield
The richest crop that it can grow,
Is a crop of houses in a row

[Anon., quoted in Edward Lance Tarbuck’s Handbook of House Property (1875), p.161.]

In 2022, Stephen Midlane and Philip Boys, from the Friends of Wandsworth Common's Heritage Group, proposed a challenging collective project: to research and document the “Lost Houses and Gardens of Wandsworth Common”. Old maps of the area clearly showed a number of houses, small and large, most of which had disappeared by the late-19th and early-20th centuries. Numerous volunteers became involved in this fascinating initiative, each choosing from the long list of candidate houses.

The first to be studied included the "Five Houses" built along the east side of Wandsworth Common in the late 18th century. Initially the road that passed their front gates was called Five Houses Lane or Road but is now [since about ? has been ] known as Bolingbroke Grove.

A small group (two of whom live on Bolingbroke Grove itself) rose to the challenge. While researches continued, progress was demonstrated in several presentations to the Friends and to the Wandsworth Historical Society [ADD dates].

It soon became clear that there was considerable interest in these and other houses on and around the Common. This book, which we hope will be the first of many, is the result.

Sarah Vey
Henrietta Gentilli
Mark Luboff
Philip Boys


[MAP? Possibly show a map from c.1868 with "Lost Houses and Gardens" marked and listed, including the Five Houses. This to show the historical context, but also the choice that had been available to potential volunteers. PB's original map is a start, though needs work.

Many were deliberately built facing the Common. Most were cited on main roads around or across the Common (East Hill, Nightingale Lane, Trinity Road), or slightly back from the Common, but not in side streets (which are mainly a late-19C creation, as we shall see.)

Some but not all are named on this 1868 map. Other names may be retrievable. Names changed (e.g. with changes in their owner or lessee. Often simply named after their owner/lessee, or e.g. after trees (Elms, Mulberry, other? etc). Or as in Bramblebury House, formerly Heathfield House [check] because the new owner wanted to recall their previous home before they arrived in Wandsworth.

It may be worth limiting this to houses named or clearly present in the 1860s' Metallurgicon. Very diverse - Allfarthing Manor, institutions (e.g. schools), Farms, Prison Turret houses etc - but most were detached villas or small mansions [explain?] surrounded by their own gardens.

Building dates (or earliest representation on a map). Demolition dates. Perhaps list roads that now occupy the site.

The houses and gardens may have disappeared, but often leave traces. The route taken by a road. Road-names. Substantial walls that once separated adjacent estates. The most obvious case is the Toast Rack, once an indistinguishable part of the Common, then enclosed for nurseries and scattered houses, that now reaches out like a ? into the Common.]


-
House No.House NameBuiltDemolishedLocation
1Bolingbroke House17771937Between Wakehurst Road & Belleville Road
2The Grove / Grove House1777–781889Between Kelmscott Road & Bramfield Road
3Bolingbroke Grove House17771864Between Cobham Close & Darley Road
4The Elms17771880Honeywell Road
5Dent’s House1777–781881–2Between Gorst Road & Dent’s Road

[Do we really know the exact dates? Or is 1777-78 or simply c.1777 sufficient?]

[NEEDS TIGHTENING UP AND/OR EXTENDING:


The Five Houses

[Where does the quote start? Is it verbatim? Do we really want to quote Timothy Walker here at all? There are quite a lot of lifted passges, especially from the Survey Better to paraphrase for ourselves? ]

In the late 18th century, five houses were built on the east side of Wandsworth Common, with gardens and grounds that ran down to (and in one?some?) cases across the Falcon Brook, a seasonal stream that now runs beneath Northcote Road [since?].

The Falcon Brook was culverted (buried underground in a sewer pipe) in the 1860s.  

In 1865, the Metropolitan Board of Works formally approved a £30,000 project to cover and enclose the brook as part of London's Victorian sanitation overhaul. This allowed the marshy valley along Northcote Road and St John's Road to be laid out for suburban housing and street development following the opening of nearby Clapham Junction station in 1863.

"They all had pleasure grounds containing landscaped gardens and walks and were described as 'very genteel modern built brick houses which overlook the common towards the west.'”

[Timothy Walker, Twixt the Commons: The Development of a Victorian Suburb (2010,) p.? PB to add. Whose quote?]

[Clapham compared with Wandsworth. How does this relate to Clapham Common's popularity for wealthy people, demonstrated on maps that show the dwellings all the way round CC? But although this also happened to some extent around Wandsworth Common, villas were never so continuous, one next to the other, as all round Clapham Common, but scattered. Compare e.g. Gould's map of Clapham 1815 with Wandsworth at that time.]

By the mid-18th century, City of London merchants had begun to colonise the higher ground in Battersea, away from the village of Battersea by the River Thames, along Lavender Hill, and around the fringes of what are now known as Wandsworth Common and Clapham Common. [? This area was then generally known as Battersea Rise.] The open, healthy environment and easy access to London and the villages of Wandsworth and Clapham made this an ideal location for a second home.

[Why ideal? Why second homes? Add something about e.g. having home in the City for life during the week, typically above or near the business. But having a place where one's wife and children could live a more agreeable life, to which you could travel [at the weekend - [NB no such thing as "the weekend" for most until the C20 etc etc]. Increased importance of receiving guests, socialising etc. in more spacious, agreeable surroundings. Easy and swift access to and from the City.]

[Not just City Merchants - are bankers merchants? Also industrialists (London, but also Wandsworth) ? Ex-army? Ex-East India Company? It would be good to have a clear picture of the class/occupational profile for the two Common at different times to show similarities and differences.]

[At the same time...] This trend was closely connected to simultaneous changes in land ]ownership. [DEL?: As the interest among City merchants took off,] Second Viscount Bolingbroke’s debts forced him to offer long leases on parcels of his land in the manor of Battersea and subsequently for him to sell his estate to John Spencer (later First Earl). This opened the way for villa development on a large scale, as Earl Spencer sold freeholds in the 1760s and 1770s.]

The early houses around the two Commons were occupied by people of wealth, including Isaac Ackerman (Battersea Rise House), the antiquarian Thomas Astle, and Richard Lovelace and Robert Dent, both partners in Child’s Bank.

[? Child, interestingly, had bought ?'s house at Osterley Park, which, like nearby Chiswick House, Marble Hill House and Strawberry Hill House, were themselves not [intended to be permanent homes] but used only for occasional leisure and pleasure, parties etc.]

Osterley Park, Chiswick House, Marble Hill, and Strawberry Hill were part of a group of 18th-century "suburban villas" or country retreats along the Thames west of London. They were designed primarily as social showpieces and summer retreats rather than year-round family homes. The Historical ContextFunction over Residence: Rich bankers, aristocrats, and intellectuals built or remodeled these villas—often designed by prominent architects like Robert Adam (Osterley), William Kent (Chiswick), and Horace Walpole (Strawberry Hill)—specifically to entertain, show off their art collections, and throw day parties.Primary vs. Temporary Homes: Wealthy owners usually maintained a primary townhouse in central London for business and parliamentary duties, alongside a larger ancestral country seat elsewhere in England.Osterley's Specific Use: The Child banking family used Osterley as a "country house" escape from London to impress clients and host lavish gatherings. While it was grander and possessed larger grounds than Chiswick or Strawberry Hill, it served a similar role as a seasonal entertainment venue rather than a permanent everyday residence. Scale & Estate Size: Chiswick House, Marble Hill, and Strawberry Hill are quintessential examples of compact "villa" architecture with modest residential quarters. Osterley, while fulfilling the same seasonal/social function, was significantly larger, featuring extensive parkland and farm estates. Shift Over Time: Osterley actually became a secondary home later in its history when the heiress of the Child family married into the Earls of Jersey family in 1804. Their main estate was in Oxfordshire, rendering Osterley strictly a seasonal or occasional residence from that point forward.

Robert Dent built himself a house, designed by Richard Norris the younger, which later became known as Old Park House, on the south-east corner of the area between the Commons in 1775–6, with an associated farm and grounds. Over the next [few decades / twenty-five years] he was involved in a number of land transactions in Battersea to the west of the Falcon Brook, resulting in three large estates and two smaller ones. [These comprised] five substantial houses, two with associated farms and most with associated cottages. These properties and farms all lay along with what was initially known as Five Houses Lane andor Road, but by the [1850s?] as Bolingbroke Grove.

[Earliest ref to "Bolingbroke Grove"? How Chatham Road was originally called BG.]

Lovelace [who he?], who owned land to the east of the brook, sold it in 1797 to the owners of two of the Five Houses built by Dent and further land to the East of the brook was added to the estate that became Dent’s House. This allowed three of the Five Houses to extend their plots across the brook and for some to make use of a wide track or "green lane" (which became Webb’s Road), affording rear access to the estates and the protection of a lodge (later known as Australia Lodge) situated at the junction of the lane and Battersea Rise.

The sale of a farm in the north-west corner of the area between the commons, owned by Samuel Hoare, to William Willis (partner in the bank Willis Percival and owner of one of the Five Houses) in 1797 completed the picture. After these transactions, the pattern of land ownership remained almost unchanged for about sixty years, and the result is shown in the map below, based on the 1838 tithe map.

Land ownership around Bolingbroke Grove and Battersea Rise, based on the 1838 tithe map

[A very bad map. What was the source? Redraw and rotate so BG runs NS. Probably best to adapt the Tithe Map original.]

[Text below is obv. taken from the Survey. Sort out referencing but probably better to rewrite in our own words.]

["] One of the larger transactions involved Robert Dent selling the land on the corner of Battersea Rise and Bolingbroke Grove, including Bolingbroke House, to the eminent banker, William Willis, partner of the bank Willis Perceval. This was the only house of the five to survive into the 20th century, having been rescued by Erskine Clarke to become "Bolingbroke Hospital” [date?


Five Houses Road and Balham Lane

[MUST BE CAREFUL HERE BECAUSE THE TEXT IS LIFTED FROM the "Survey of London: Battersea" [add reference]. Admittedly it's an attributed quote, but not necessarily the way to go.]

“The Georgian mansions that once graced the west and south fringes of this area, fronting what were then known as Five Houses Road or Lane and Balham Lane (now Bolingbroke Grove and Nightingale Lane respectively), were built on land owned by Robert Dent (d.1805), senior partner in Child & Co.’s bank. Like his near neighbour and banking partner Richard Lovelace, Dent benefited hugely from his association with the Child family, being one of the trustees and main beneficiaries under the will of Robert Child of Osterley Park in 1782.

Dent had taken ground here in the 1760s, presumably on lease from Lord Spencer. Then in December 1772 he bought from Spencer the freehold to all the fields skirting the two roads, with the exception of a plot at the southeast corner (part of Christopher Baldwin’s Clapham Common take) and Bolingbroke Farm to the north-west, in the previous ownership of merchant Samuel Hoare. In all, Dent acquired twenty fields, totalling about 88 acres, at a cost of £5,650. In 1775 he added part of an adjoining field calld Broomfield, procured from Christopher Baldwin.

In 1775–6 Robert Dent built himself a house with spacious grounds, east of the Falcon Brook, known as Old Park House. To the west of the brook, on the land overlooking Wandsworth Common, often referred to by the more general name of Battersea Rise, he erected five more large gentlemen’s residences as a speculation. Four were finished by November 1777 when they were advertised in the London press as “new, substantial-built, brick houses, neatly finished”, for sale or to let; the fifth was completed a year or two later. [Chhk consistency with table pg 4 of start /end build dates]

Robert Dent had employed the City surveyor Richard Norris (1749–1792) gentleman, to design and build his villa, Old Park House. This was most likely to have been Richard Norris the younger (d.1792), rather than his father (d.1779). Both men held a string of important surveyorships, Norris junior’s including Christ’s Hospital, the Sun Fire Office, the London Assurance Incorporation and the Charterhouse. It is likely that Norris also designed several of the Five Houses; he was the first lessee of at least two of them.

At least one of the Five Houses (Grove House) was the work of John Scott, a Holborn surveyor and associate of the Norris’s, who also held a lease from Dent. Norris’s brother Philip, a Holborn builder and bricklayer trained by their father, witnessed all these deeds and probably handled the construction side; another brother and witness, Christopher, of Lincoln’s Inn, was presumably their lawyer. All four men were listed in newspaper advertisements during the winter of 1777–8 as contacts for prospective purchasers or lessees.

Early descriptions of the Five Houses as “genteel”, “modern”, and “brick-built” suggest equivalence with those going up [being established] around Clapham Common and Lavender Hill at the same time. All had the Falcon Brook running behind or through their gardens and grounds.

These villas were more concise in scale and style than the earlier mansions of Lovelace, Ackerman and Thornton, generally just two to three storeys over a basement and quite plain, in brick or stucco, with decoration limited to bow or bay windows allowing views and perhaps a porticoed entrance. As with the other substantial houses built around the Commons in the late 18th century, those designed by better architects relied for effect on subtle variations in rhythm and proportion. Often the plainness was taken to extreme.

So, the Five Houses were not identical in size or design. The limitations of many of these villas were reflected in their internal planning, the standard form being a compact, but often inconvenient arrangement of rooms, grouped around a central hall or staircase. A farm (Dent’s Farm) was erected at the south end, in the grounds of a house acquired from Dent by his brother William (d.1823); another stood beside Old Park House. [H: I am not sure I get the link btw the 2 sentences above para? ]

By the 1850s Five Houses [Lane/Road] had become more generally known by its modern name of Bolingbroke Grove.”