Wandsworth Common

1892

Cycling — Saturday 23 January 1892 target="_blank">Link.]

[Nice image]

WE RECEIVED ON JANUARY STH, 1892, From W. S. JACKSON, Esq., North Side, Wandsworth Common, S.W. P.S.Would just like to say that I have every reason to be thoroughly satisfied with the machine. I have ridden some hundreds of miles on the E. and W. of England roads, thus giving it a fair trial, and it is as sound at the end of the season as when new; not a screw or spoke failing, which speaks volumes for the thorough workmanship used in the construction. The " SPARTAN " is a thoroughly reliable machine. W. S. JACKSON.

[BNA: Link.]


Cycling — Saturday 30 January 1892 target="_blank">Link.]

[for images etc rudge quadricycle tandem

[BNA:


Cycling — Saturday 30 January 1892

(Click on image to enlarge)

QUADRICYCLE TANDEM, BY RUDGE CO., good as new, 2 in. pneumatic Clincher tires, bail pedals, extra brake, extra plated front, two spare extra Clincher air tubes, luggage carrier, Sphinx leather touring bag, gold lined, condition of plate and machine perfectly as new, list price £52, will take £30.

Seen by appointment. H.L.C., 19, Nightingale Crescent, Blenkarne Road, Wandsworth Common, SW.'

[BNA: Link.]

(Click on image to enlarge)

On "quad" or "quadracycles", see DouglasSelf.com:The Museum of RetroTechnology: www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/TRANSPORT/quadcycle/quadcycle.htm" target="_blank">The Quadracycle.

The Common — and particularly the long straight road eventually named Trinity Road n — regularly used for cycle racing. It was also the start and end point for club rides, as here:


South London Press — Saturday 27 February 1892" target="_blank">Link.]

WANDSWORTH COMMON. The committee reported that adjoining Wandsworth Common station, near Nightingale-lane, wore about nine acres of land which were originally part of Wandsworth Common, and purchased many years ago by the London, Brighton, and Sooth Coast Hallway Company, and them .freed commonablc rights. The company haring all the land they required, resold the remainder to the late Mr. J. A. Rose, who kept the area unbuilt upon as an adjunct his own grounds. Mr. Rose, however, died last year, and his property was now the market. Xhe committee thought that so much it comprised what was originally Wandsworth Common should obtained if possible, and restored to that open space, but they were not prepared to recommend the Council to pay excessive or building land price for it. They recommended: That Mr. E. Bray informed that, although the Council consider the ground referred to would be of use as open space, it is not prepared to pay 12,000 for it.'- . the suggestion of Mr. Burns, the matter was referred to the local authorities for their opinion.

[BNA: Link.]


South London Press — Saturday 12 March 1892" target="_blank">Link.]

PROPOSED ADDITION TO WANDSWORTH COMMON. The Works and General Purposes Committee recommended that, with reference the letter from Mr. E. M. Bray, dated February 4, suggesting the desirability of the Council acquiring and adding Wands worth Common the piece of land lying between Wandsworth Common railway station and the private lane the south-west end of Nightingale-lane, and asking that vestry should contribute towards the cost, the vestry clerk should be directed to address a communication the Council urging desirability of the acquirement by the Council the land question for the of the public. In connection with the same subject a letter was read from Mr. H. la Hooke, clerk, London County Council, dated March 3, stating that the Council had been offered this land for the earn .12,000, bnt that the Council were not prepared themselves to pay so largo sum for the land, although they were satisfied that the acquisition of the land would be of advantage the public, and they inquired whether the vestry and the board works for the Wandsworth district were prepared contribute towards the cost and The recommendation the committee was adopted.

[BNA: Link.]


[UNKNOWN PUBLICATION — header not detected. Please review.]

"HAYES VILLA, WANDSWORTH COMMON?

MARY AGNES ILLINGWORTH?

Old Bailey Proceedings Online (www.oldbaileyonline.org, version 8.0, 26 March 2022), April 1892, trial of GEORGE MOTTE (t18920404-452).

GEORGE MOTTE, Deception > forgery, 4th April 1892.

452. GEORGE MOTTE , Forging and uttering an order for 10, with intent to defraud.

MR. KIDD Prosecuted, and MR. ELLIOTT Defended.

SIDNEY SMITH . I am the son of Sidney Smith, a grocer, of Kirkdale, Sydenhamon the evening of 11th March the prisoner came into the shop and presented this envelope, enclosing a note and a cheque Iread it and said, " Isee you want change for this, and I am not sure I have got it"he said, "Well, I should like you to oblige me if possible, because there is a party on, and a little baccarat"we have a customer named Craig, but I do not know his writing I had not got enough, and got it from Mr. Glass, and gave the money to the prisoner, and three bottles of whiskyhe then said, "What champagne have you got?" I showed him the list; he selected a pint bottle, and told me to send a dozen next day to Mr. Craig I did so, and it was returned the following, week Iendorsed the cheque and gave it to Mr. Glass, and it was returned marked "No account" I had been to the station the day before and described the man as a man in evening dress, but I did not describe him fullyFrederick Newland, our stableman, was about the premises.

Cross-examined. I had never seen the prisoner before I was not quite able to identify the prisoner at the station, and I heard a voice behind me say, "Who is the nearest?"

Re-examined. I have no doubt now; I cannot say who said thatseveral policemen and detectives were there; there were twelve or fourteen people in a row.

JOHN CRAIG . I am a manufacturer, of Upper Sydenhamthis letter is not my writing; I do not use paper like thisthis is my address at the topmy son bears the same name; it is not his writing I do not bank at the London and South-Western Bank I was out of town on 11th March.

Cross-examined. My son has no paper with this heading I know nothing of the prisoner.

FREDERICK NEWLAND . I am. stableman to the prosecutoron 11th March, about closing time, 8.20, I was outside the shop, and saw the prisoner walk in and out I saw young Mr. Smith come back from Mr. Glass, and give the prisoner something, and he left with a parcelon 23rd November I was in High Road, Balham, with Sergeant Bunting, and saw the prisoner on the opposite side of the road; Ipointed him out, and he was taken into custodyhe was not dressed in the same way on the 11th; he had a dark coat on, a high hat, black trousers, a chain, and a white neck-tie, evening dress, I suppose; and on the 23rd he had a dark blue coat and dark trousers Inave no doubt the prisoner is the man.

Cross-examined. My attention was called to the matter about three days after the 11th I saw him for about five or six minutes on the

11thhe was as if he was waiting for my masterhe had a dark overcoat on; lit was not buttoned I could not see what sort of coat he had on underneathhe displayed a good bit of shirt front, and had a white tie I had instructions from Mr. Smith to go to Balham on the 23rdthe detective took me thereit is rather more than six miles offthe detective told me if I saw a man I knew I was to point him outafter accusing the prisoner I went back to the shop and told Mr. Smith we had got the man, and he went to the station with me and identified him I did not describe him to Mr. Smith in any way, nor did he ask how he was dressed when Iaccosted him I did not give a description to him of how the man was dressed on the 11th, nor did Itell the Magistrate soif it is down in my deposition it is a mistake I did give him a description after he had been to the station, but not beforeone of the assistants told me that the cheque was bad I did not know when I saw the man on the 11th that he had given a cheque to be changed I knew nothing of the business that was going on.

Re-examined. On the night of the 11th the prisoner seemed to be waiting for something, and Iremembered that on being told that a forgery-had been committed.

HARRY WALLIS . I have been for five years a clerk at the Clapham Junction branch of the London and South Western Bankwe have no customer named John Craigthere has been an alteration in the numbers of this cheque (produced), 83 in my opinion was 38, which is the number of the Clapham Junction branch I cannot tell what figures have been altered in the other number, but I know some have.

Cross-examined. We have no such number in our cheque books as is now represented by this cheque; three or four other cheques have been drawn on our books by persons who have no account, which have been cashed by tradespeopleMr. Ernest Carter, junr., banks at our branch.

By the COURT. The prisoner had no account at our bankthis was originally a Clapham Junction branch cheque.

FREDERICK BUNTING (Detective P). On March 23rd I was with Newland in Balham High Road at 10.30 a.m., he pointed the prisoner out, and I said I was a police officer, and should take him in custody for uttering a cheque on March 11th to Sidney Smith, of Sydenhamhe said, "You have made a mistake, I am surprised at your stopping a gentleman in the street like this. I have been in Balham fifteen years. I am just going to pay my taxes; did you say Sydenham? I have not been there for 'three years, I suppose I can go before a Magistrate to-day. Can you tell me what sort of day it was on 11th March?" I said, "It was snowing"he said, "That man you have with you belongs to the Powis's, who hare done this" I took him to the station, and found on him four memoranda, a tax-paper and cheque, five pawn-tickets, one albert, one eraser, one knife, and fourpence. (The cheque was for rates drawn the London and South Western Bank, Balham branch, signed George Motte.) I said, "Is this your writing?he said, "Yes" I found two cheque-books at his house, one of which was on the London and South-Western Bank, Clapham branch Icompared the letters found on him with the letter asking for the cashing of the cheque, and there is a similarity in the "f' s" and in the "C"in "Conservative club," and told the prisoner that the letters corresponded Iplaced him with ten more at the station and told Smith to see if he knew any one therehe looked

and said, " I am not sure, but I think that is the man,"pointing to the prisoner I said, "If you see him, go and touch him"he said, " I am sure that is the man," and touched him.

By the COURT. I did not hear any one behind Mr. Smith say, "Who is nearest?"

Cross-examined. Ifind that the prisoner has an account at the Balaam branch of this banka forged cheque has been cashed by Mr. Killett, a tradesman of Balhamhe knows the prisoner perfectly well, and says he is not the person who cashed the chequethe letter given by Mr. Killett has the same style of heading and the same style of writing; I should say it was written by the same personthere are two other cases, and the tradesmen in each have failed to identify the prisonerthe circumstances are similar.

The prisoner's statement before the Magistrate: " I know nothing whatever of the case. "

Witnesses for the Defence.

GEORGE FELLOWS (Detective V). Ireceived instructions in February from Mr. Killett, of Balham, to make inquiries respecting a person who had presented this forged cheque (produced) to himthis note was with the cheque I do not say that the letters are on similar paper Iarranged for Mr. Killett to see the prisoner in custody, he knew him personally and said he was not the man; there have been two other cases in which the tradesmen not only failed to identify the prisoner, but they said he was not the man.

Cross-examined. I was present when Mr. Killett said he was not the man; and when we got outside he said, " I know that man" I went with him to Greenwich Police-court.

FANNY EDDLES . I am the wife of Robert Eddies, a baker, of Balhamon Friday, March 11th, we were living in the same house as the prisoner and his wife; we had done so since last autumnhis sister-inlaw did not stay there, but she called there Iused to go out at five o'clock and return between six and seventhe prisoner was not at home at that time Iprepared my husband's supper at a little after sevenwhen I went out that evening between eight and nine the prisoner opened the parlour-door I have never seen him in evening dress during the whole time I have lived in the house, and I have known him twelve years.

Cross-examined. I cannot be sure whether I saw him on the Thursday or the day before, but I know I saw him on Wednesday evening I saw him on Saturday evening about ten minutes' walk from Balham Station I do not know how long it would take to go to Sydenham by train; it takes about twenty minutes to go to the Police-station.

Re-examined. Iremember March 11th because it was my birthday, and he wished me many happy returns of the day Ireceived a letter, which I have with me now.

MARY AGNES ILLINGWORTH . Ilive at Hayes Villa, Wandsworth Commonthe prisoner married my sister Icalled on her on Friday, March 11th, about 7.15 p.m.the prisoner was at home Iremained till 8.20he was there the whole timehe was not in evening dress, he was dressed as he is now, except that he had a light tie, it was not white, it was a little check.

Cross-examined. Ioften call there Icalled there the day after, and

again on the Monday Icalled on the Saturday afternoon and took the children a pine apple Icalled on the Monday about eight o'clock I am always in the habit of calling on my sister on Fridays and Mondays I have been a witness in this Court before in the case of Miss Harrison for libel; she was acquittedIt was suggested that I had written the letters to myself I am not married; I am living with my parents.

The prisoner received a good character.

NOT GUILTY ."189244" target="_blank">Link.]


Globe — Saturday 9 April 1892 target="_blank">Link.]

College Park building land for sale; [NB "College Park Estate" is now called the Toast Rack.]

(Click on image to enlarge)

WANDSWORTH, S.W. Eligible Building Land, being the uncovered residue of the College Park Estate, situate Wandsworth, adjoining the Common. It comprises nearly five acres, with upwards of 1,600 feet of important building frontages. Held from Magdalen College, Oxiord, for unexpired term of 87 1/2 years, at nominal ground-rents, in all 6 per annum.

MESSRS NORTON, TRIST, and GILBERT have received instructions to SELL the above BUILDING LAND by AUCTION, at the Mart, Tokenhouse-yard, London, E.C., on TUESDAY, April 26th, at Two o'clock precisely, in Three Lots of nearly two acres each. Particulars, with Plans, may obtained of Messrs. Budd, Son, Brodie, Solicitors, 33, Bedford-row, W.C.; and of the Auctioneers, 63, Old Broadstreet, E.C."189249


"[=TOAST RACK"]

Sussex Agricultural Express — Saturday 16 April 1892 target="_blank">Link.]

WANDSWORTH, S.W.-ELIGIBLK BUILDING LAND, being the uncovered residue of the College Park Estate, situate Wandsworth, adjoining the Common, about a quarter of mile from Wandsworth Common Station, on the L.B. and S.C. Railway, and about one mile from Clapham Junction Railway Station. It comprises altogether nearly five acres, with upwards of 1, 60u feet of Important building frontages Trinity, Baskerville, Henderson, and Dorlcote-roads. Held from Magdalen College, Oxford, for an unexpired terra of 87$ years at nominal ground rents, in all 8 per annum.

MESSRS. NORTON, TRIBT, AND GILBERT HAVE received inatructionn TO SELL the above BUILDING LAND BY AUCTION, at the Mart. Tokenhouae yard, London, K.C., on TUESDAY, April 26th, 1892, at Two o'clock precisely, in three lots of nearly two acres each. Particulars, with plans and conditions of sale, may be obtained of Messrs Budd, Son, and Brodie, Solicitors, 33, Bedford-row, W.C.: at the Mart; and of the Auctioneers. 62, Old Broad-street, E.C.

[BNA:


"GOLF

TOOTING COMMON

Wallington & Carshalton Herald — Saturday 21 May 1892 target="_blank">Link

.]

In consequence of complaints of danger from playing golf on the Tooting Commons received by the London County Council, the Parks Committee of that body have recommended the Cauneiland the Connect adopted the recommendationto prohibit the playing of golf there in future. The danger i s greater at Tooting than on some open ',pates, because the force prevents the pl being always sem. Whilst the club is arranging a new ground it is propound that golf chill be allowed on the Tooting Commons up to half past 10 in the morning, thia aoncession to for a period of six weeks only.

[BNA: Link.]

1892521" target="_blank">Link.]


[UNKNOWN PUBLICATION — header not detected. Please review.]

"https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse. jsp?id=t18920523-583÷=t18920523-583&terms=wandsworth_common#highlight

Old Bailey Proceedings Online (www.oldbaileyonline.org, version 8. 0, 26 March 2022), May 1892, trial of WALTER BEADON (t18920523-583).

WALTER BEADON, Theft > burglary, 23rd May 1892.

583. WALTER BEADON, Burglariously entering the dwelling house of George Harold Quaint, and stealing twelve pieces of paper and thirty-six postage stamps his property.

M. R. RAVEN Prosecuted.

GEORGE HAROLD QUAINT. I am schoolmaster at St. James' Industrial Schools, Upper Tooting — Ilive on the premises — on 2nd May I went to bed at 10 p. m., leaving the place properly shut up — there was a screw through the window; the top sash was pinned — the prisoner was at school there four years ago — next morning, at six, the boy who does my room told me something, and I went down and found the sitting-room window

open, the things strewed about the room, the clipboards and drawersopen, and the contents of a portmanteau strewn about the room — Imissed a writing desk, which were about twelve Post-office form forms for the boys to affix stamps to and When they are filled up you make a deposit in the bank — there were some stamps on each at them, stack on like this — these (produced) are three of them — the boys' names are in pencil at the back; they bring their stamps or pennies, and Ikeep them till Inave got one shilling worth, and then pay them into the post-office — the friends send them the stamps; it is an orphan school — I had no dealings with this particular post-office.

MARY LIZZIE ENGLEEFEILD., I am a clerk hi the post-office, Queen'sroad, Chelsea — Iissued this Post office Savings Bank book — on May 4th the prisoner called for the book between seven and eight — he wanted topay in 3s., but I had closed my account — I took these three slips, and asked him to call in the morning for the book, which he did between nine and ten, I think, and Igave this book; which shows a deposit of 3s. in the name of Walter Beadon — the 3s. was paid by these forms.

GEORGE HUARD. I am a clerk at the General Post Office — these three Savings Bank deposit slips came to open an account from the. Queen's Road, Chelsea, Office, on May 5th; Ireceived the stamps as cash.

Francis Gunn (154 V). On 6th May about 3. 15 a. m., I was on duty on Wandsworth Common With another, officer — I saw the prisoner running along the rail way — Ibeard a bell ringing; we stood under a black fence, and when he got within a few yards Istepped out, and, said, "Where are you going? what ate you running, for this time of morning?" — he was carrying this basket — he said, "what has that todo with you?" — I told him I was a police officer; we were in plain clothes — he said, "Well, I am going to Chelsea" — I said, "Where do you come from now?" — he said, " I am not going to tell you any more I have told you enough already" — I took him to the station.

The prisoner produced a Written defence, part of which only applied to this case. He stated that he had saved 3s. towards buying a barrow, and a fellow-lodger, whose name he did not know, asked him to buy the stamps of him, which he did, and deposited them in the bank in half an hour.

G. H. QUAINT (Re-examined). My window was hinged? the bottom part does not go. up or down-it is six feet high — a stool. had been put outside on the Bowers, and a ladder.

GUILTY. ss

He then PLEADED GUILTY to a conviction at this Court of burglary on April 6, 1891. There were two other indictments against him -

Eighteen Month's Hard Labour.

'"1892523" target="_blank">Link.]


"V ODD PENNY STORY

Stamford Mercury — Friday 1 July 1892 target="_blank">Link.]

At Wandsworth police-court, on Saturday, Charles Ward, a schoolboy, living near Wandsworth Common, was placed in the dock charged with stealing a pennyworth of hay from a field at Blackshaw-road, the property of Mr. J. J. Keosil, of Norfolk Farm, Tooting. Mr. Denman told the boy that he was charged under a section which entitled him to be discharged on paying the value of the hay. The boy hesitated, and made no reply. Mr. Denman then said he would lend him the penny, and the boy could return it whenever felt disposed. He, nevertheless, assured the boy that, in lending him the money, he way desired to encourage him in his theft. Tbe penny was passed to the boy, who offered it to the prosecutor, but he refused to accept it, stating, before leaving tbe court, that he was induced charge him in consequence of circumstances which had come to bis knowledge about a previous matter. The penny was returned to the magistrate, amid some laughter, and the boy left the court.

[BNA: Link.]


[UNKNOWN PUBLICATION — header not detected. Please review.]

"https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t18920725-680÷=t18920725-680&terms=wandsworth_common#highlight

[BNA:

Cross-examined. This is not a bit like the "5" on a 15s. order, and I should notice the "fif" in "fifteen" at oncethis "shilling" ought to be "shillings"it must be signed before payment.

Re-examined. Ipay orders as well as issue themthis (produced) is a genuine order for 15s.the "5" in 16s. in the forged order is smaller than that in the genuine orderit is a very bad imitation.

MASON CHALES FAULDING . I am manager of the Magneto-Electric Battery Company, Imperial Chambers, Oxford Streeton April 20th Ireceived by post this letter, dated April 19th, signed "Mary Agnes Illingworth," and containing this order, signed "Miss Emma Illingworth"; it contained this postal order purporting to be for 15s. as it is nowit appeared to have been altered, and Imade a communication at once to the Post Office authoritieson 22nd April Iwrote this letter to the prisoner in reply to her letter. (Enquiring whether the three belts ordered were for the same person and were to be eighteen inches each)on 22nd April this letter came in a registered envelope. (Requesting that the belts might be

sent or the 15s. returned, signed MARY AGNES ILLINGWORTH, 113, St. James's Road, Upper Tooting.)that contained a form marked "Paid for 15s."on April 23rd Ireceived this letter in answer to mine: ("Gentlemen,Kindly send me three belts, one 18 inches, one 20, and one 24. Pardon my not being more explicit.M. A. ILLINGWORTH.") Isent the belts by registered letter post, addressed to Miss Illingworth, with this letter. (Stating that the belts were enclosed)this (produced) is the registered envelopeon 30th April Ireceived this letter, dated the 29th. (This teas signed by the prisoner, and stated that she was pleased with the belts, and had given two of them to two ladies, who offered her 10s. each for them)we have not received them back.

Cross-examined. We advertise very largely; we do not send circulars by post; we insert them loose in weekly and monthly publications, and in newspaperswe receive a very large number of postal orders I saw immediately that the "5" was different to what it ought to beit was not a large order, but three belts for one person was curious; one person would require them all the same sizewhoever wrote that letter gave us an excellent testimonial, which was apparently voluntary I saw at Bow Street this draft of a letter on the back of one of the forms: "113, St. James's Road, Upper Tooting. Dear Sir, Ireturn you the three belts; they have not been ordered by me or by my authority.MARY AGNES ILLINGWORTH."

Re-examined. We did not receive any such letter as that on the back of my letter enclosing the belts.

REUBEN JONES . I am a postman attached to the Tooting sorting officeon 28th April Ireceived a registered packet addressed to Miss Illingworth, 113, St. James' Road I detained it till next morning, and handed it to the postman Cook, and gave him this form of receipt (produced), with instructions.

JOHN FRANCIS COOK . I am a postman attached to the Tooting Post-officeon 26th April Ireceived a registered letter addressed to Miss Illingworththis is the cover of it Ialso received this form of receipt to get signed I went to the house at 12.20, and delivered it to the prisoner, who I knewshe took the receipt into a room, and brought it back signed as it is now.

EDWIN BUTLER . I am a detective police sergeant attached to the General Post Officeon 9th May, about seven p.m., Iarrested the prisoner on a warrant I had had her under observation for some time Iread the warrant to her; she said, " I am innocent" I then showed her the postal order and the letter, and said, "This is the order you are charged with forging, and this is your letter which accompanied it"she said, "Those are like the other forgeries" I took her to Tooting Police-station, and requested her to turn out her pockets, which she did, and handed me her purse, a bunch of keys, and a diaryin the purse was this cutting from a newspaper. (This was a report of a discussion in the Souse of Commons on 26th April, 1892, on the subject of stolen and altered postal orders) I went to her father's house, and he showed me her room, and in a drawer there, which Iunlocked with the keys I got from her, I found these two packets of circulars of the Magneto-Electric Company, addressed to Miss Illingworth, also a bundle of circulars from the Savings Bank Department, and telegrams and other papers from the Post Office, and this cover of a

registered letter, with which was the letter from the Magneto-Electric Company, which Igave to the prisoner, and said, "This is a letter I found in your drawer"she said, " Ireceived the belts, I did not order them, and Ireturned them by post from the Bellevue Road Post-office, and left them there about 1.80 the same day; Ipaid 4d. postage"the original postage was 2d., and 2 1/2 d. registration feeshe did not say whether she had returned them by registered letterin answer to the charge she said, " I am innocent"the reply on the back of the circular was read before the Magistrate, and she said, " Iwrote that."

Cross-examined. The Post Office authorities have had her under observation on and off for six monthsa claim had been made on the Post Office for 7 10s., and another in respect of some Post Office Savings Bank amountswe should not pay a claim on a cheque sent by letter unless we believed the cheque was sent, and as to the claim about the Savings Bank, it can be ascertained whether a person has money there or not I found some letters addressed to her father by the Post Office as far back as February, about the forged stampsthe Post Office has not been defrauded of anything but the postage of the letters, whore a forged stamp has been used; "Official, Paid," is on themthe correspondence has been going on about a year.

Re-examined. I have had occasion to watch her in respect of a charge not connected with this; there were a very great number of libellous and indecent cards, in consequence of which Iwatched her.

FREDERICK CARTWRIGHT . I am an assistant in the Confidential Enquiry branch of the General Post Officeon 26th April I had instructions to watch the house where the prisoner lived at Tooting, and did so from 12.45 that day I knew hershe came out about 1.10, and walked down St. James's Road to Wandsworth Common, and along a footpath on the common, and crossed to a pond, which she walked round and then went homeBellevue Road is at the end of St. James's Road, but she did not go by the Post Office; she turned away from it, going 30 yards from it Icontinued my observations till five o'clock, but did not see her come out again.

Cross-examined. Iwatched fifteen days, but only three days that week; the earliest date was February 12th, 1891 Imade this note the day after last Session, in case you asked me the dates Iwatched her Imade it from a book which Ikeep at the office Imade no report with regard to the day Ispeak ofwhen I. was watching Iprobably had my meals at a public-house close by; Isometimes had my dinner at 2.30it took about five minutes to get from Miss Illingworth's house and back.

Re-examined. Imade no written report Irelieved Sergeant Butler on this Tuesday, and when Ileft, at five o'clock, Mr. Stevens, jun., came on dutyButler was there when I went there.

E. BUTLER (Re-examined). Iwatched the house to April 26th; I went on duty about ten o'clock, and saw the postman Cook go to the house with lie registered letter about 12.20.4 kept observation on the house till Cartwright relieved me, shortly after 12.30.

Cross-examined. I did not give evidence with regard to this matter before the Magistrate; I was not asked any questions about it I wont about ten, and left about 12.30the postman delivered the letter, and handed me the receipt, and then Cartwright took up the watching; Imet him outside the railway station facing the prisoners house, and left

him there as soon as I had given him proper instructionsthe railway station is more than 150 yards from the house I did not wait while he had his dinner; I do not know whether he had had it.

F. CARTWRIGHT (Re-examined). I had something to eat just before I went on duty, and I had my next meal about 5.30; I did not go anywhere before that for refreshment.

JOSEPH GEORGE STEVENS . I am in the Confidental Enquiry branch of the Post Officeon 26th April I had instructions to watch the prisoner's house at Upper Tooting; Iarrived there at 4.50, and met Cartwright, who said something to mehe went away at five o'clock, and Icame on and remained till 8.30, during which time the prisoner came out twice the first time she merely went into the front garden, and did not leave the remises; the second time she went across the common towards Balham Station to a fishmonger's, and then to the post office where the postal orders had been issued from, but did not go in; she then went to a confectioner's which she had previously passed, and from there to her sister's, Mrs. Moss, in Ramsden Road, where Ileft her, when I went off duty at eight o'clock.

Cross-examined. There were five or six hearings before the Magistrate I was not called with regard to this caseCartwright told me he had had nothing to eat, and Isent him away at once at about 4.55 Ionly watched twice, on April 25th and 26th.

Re-examined. A solicitor represented the prisoner at the Police-court, but he did not cross-examine the witnesses with reference to this case.

EMILY ELKINGTON . Ilive at Princethorpe, Clapham Common, and have known the prisoner for some years; I went to school with her; she is an artist, Ibelieve I have seen her write, and know her writingthis order to send the belts is, I have not the slightest doubt, in her writing; this little yellow ticket containing the particulars is also her writing, and so is this altered postal order from 1s. to 15s., and the words "Magneto-Electric Company, and this copy, April 26th, and these two of the 22nd and 23rd, and the address and the registered envelope, and the postcard, April 29th.

Cross-examined. Ispeak to the best of my beliefshe writes a great many different hands, and this is one of the many I think they are all undisguised I have corresponded with her frequently.

FLORENCE ELIZA HARRISON . Inow live at Bournemouth I formerly lived at Maisonette, Ramsden Road, Balham, with my fatherup to September, 1890, I was on terms of friendship with the prisoner IWe corresponded with her, and am well acquainted with her writing I have no doubt that this letter of April 19th is her writing, also this order form enclosed; also the name of the paying-office and the payee on this postal order; also these letters of April 22nd and 23rd; also the covers of the letters and the letter-card, and the writing on the back of the Magneto Company's letter of April 25th I have no doubt about any of them.

Cross-examined. They are written in the same kind of writing; not variedthis diary was produced to me by the solicitor to the Post Office, for the purpose or seeing whether the entries in it were in her writing. (One entry in pencil was on April 26th: "First appearance of shadows," and on the next day "shadows," and "shadows" every day

till the day the prisoner was given in custody, the 26th being a day on which the detectives were "shadowing.")

GEORGE SMITH INGLIS . Icarry on business in Bed Lion Square, and hare studied handwriting for some yean I have examined letter A, which is the order for the belts, and B, C, and D, and the altered postal order for 15s., and have formed the opinion that they are written by Miss Illingworth Icompared them with the letter which she said at the Police-court that she wrote, and it is the sameshe writes various handsthis diary is written in a small handthe lines are very close together, but it is the same writing as the othersthe second stroke of the small "h's" turns round backwards instead of the other way, and finishes with a small knob Ifind that in the diary, too, on 28th February, in the word "birthday," and here is another "h" in the word "three" on document D, and the same in "inches" and "further"the diary has on the fly-leaf the name and address of the owner I have compared that with the "118 St. James's Road" in the order forms, and with the signaturesthere is a variety now and then; sometimes one letter is more perfect than the other, but they are by the same hand.

Cross-examined. Handwriting is a matter about which even people who have made it a study may be deceivedMr. Netherclift and I differed; he relied on the "h," showing that it was the writing of another person I said before the Magistrate, "There is a little variation in the writing"the letters to the company are in the same writing as the admitted letter; they are not disguised, and if she did not write them somebody else imitated her writing I have not looked for dissimilarities.

By the COURT. The letters in the former trial (See Vol exi. p. 269) were different ones to those which are before me now.

M.C. FAULDING (Re-examined). These bills come from my companywe do not send them out done up in this way without being asked for them, only in answer to a requestwe say (In a letter addressed to the prisoner): "In response to your application we send you" so-and-sowe should not send that without an application.

GUILTYStrongly recommended to mercy by the JURY on account of her youth. ."1892725


South London Press — Saturday 30 July 1892" target="_blank">Link

.]

THE WANDSWORTH COMMON BRIDGE. The vestry unanimously resolved to contribute the sum of 200 towards the cost the widening the London. Brighton, and South Coast Railway Company's bridge over Bellevue-road, Wandsworth Common, to feet. Certain roads are also widened to full feet.

[BNA: Link.]


Morning Post — Tuesday 16 August 1892 target="_blank">Link.]

SOUTH-WESTERN Two girls, named Annie Miller and Margaret Hyatt, aged 13 and 10 years, were charged with robbing a number of children of small sums of money en f rusted to them by their parents. Detective Lenman, who had charge of the case, said that 11 children were robbed on Saturday in the neighbourhood of Wandsworth-common.

The prisoners, although very young, were considered expert thieves. Their habit was to stand outside the shops of pawnbrokers and accost young children as they were about entering to redeem articles, taking the money, which was invariably wrapped in paper, from their hands, and after substituting copper coins for silver ones, returning them wrapped up in the same way. The children only ascertained that they had been robbed when they opened their small paper parcels to pay the pawn- broker or the tradesman, as the case might be. The mother of Hyatt attended, and "aid that her daughter had been led away by the other girl. Mr. Plowden thought that was, perhaps, true, and ordered her to be discharged. He remanded Miller to the workhouse, remarking that it was most difficult to know what to do with a girl so young.

[BNA: Link.]


""This required a good deal of pretence, for besides the fact that my brother's invitation was anything but cordial, I knew that Charles, being dyspeptic and abstemious and frugal in the matter of diet, and having a serious turn of mind, devoted the few hours of relaxation which business permitted to open-air preaching on Wandsworth Common. "

Leeds Mercury — Saturday 3 September 1892 target="_blank">Link.]

KITTY'S FATHER.

A Romance of the Period.

FRANK BARRETT, Author -Tha Admirable Lady Baddy Fane, — -Fettmd for lilt, ' CHAPTER XIX. / vr fast, arm i. parted the street a- the door the tM, York, _baking hand pfftmreflr, with the prrwn to drop Lato theatre and between the act-. Bat Shis I was only intended to mislead asy bystanders who might observing us. I saw him more wlriie wors Liverpool, and as there were more ia Birkenhead or the neighbourhood, Iconcluded that left very after our interview. And now for acme two or three wmius nothing mined to break the monotony rf our existence. monotonous, indeed, was after the exciting erects that preceded Jock's and Ipleasant companionship oi our lost friend more than I could anticipated. But what was thai loss compared with that which Kitty had to bear! And yet she went through her performance night after night with unfiling spirit, and ia our daily intercourse suffered repining word or impatient action to betray the dm? narrow and bitter disappointment she to endure. Her resignation, her fortitude, and unvarying swe--nesi of temper under these trying conditions put mo to the blush. It was she who made light the trifles that annoyed me; she who coaxed me into action when got torpid and morose; she who found topics ci conversation when I was silent. Then I would say myself, "It ia too had that such a spiritless, dufi, old ielftow . " Still there were signs of secret suffering winch fae had not the power to conceal. Outsiders like Cooper, not remarkable for quick observation snd sympathy, whispered to me,What's the matter with Kitty? She looks quite old when ahe cornea off the stage. She's losing flesh, and she ought not to hare three lines under her eyes." This depreaaaon; but were not yet the end our vein ill-luck. One day in the second wed July, Cooper, after paying me my week's salary, Mid — " You'll have to look out for another show, Holderness. I've made over all the rights "The Blue Stacking" to Howard, and he's goting to produce it London. Ispoke to him about Kitty, but it seema his wu'e is take her part, > that's go." "Well, you will start mother show, suppose?" said "No thank you. Ire weighed sll up, and find that when I've squaral up with everybody Ishall just about wbm I was Istarted. 1 to get out of it without burning my lingers, but 1 shea't meddle with hot onels again for little while." "This is had job for us — out of collar the middle the off season. When you dos--f" "July the 30th. I'm very sorry, you know, old man, but I have to look after my little hit-" Seeing my long face when IKitty asked me st am what had happened. Iin soon thrown out work, lit ap with plaanre.The p!ay he r-d-icv-l that just what we have been isn t it?- --. Her first thought was Jsk, swts-. — aa mare her than eur engnigemrn-. "But we're not it. I.- I didn't be, " said she. /'t would take aa unknown ftayev .r-sa! play the part. I wonder who M ThMt settled Mrs. l-eai.Oer H-was4 "W 11, every one knows hrr. Us is so<^_res!, , Ihea'f. Mm. Hnaiev s4 th m->-t fnl si the s>ea' the silliest sn-1 vsinrst. wm nmeu'el, ane-?t i% carried away herr.-eial aai w-utr dress- -. ply hope she -_ |.'ss half m w--!1 T>l do, dear." 1, .-igf I dtd hop- anything rhe kind. "Rut hat ar> w (Jo?- "Send advertiseoKnt h the 4 ' to ania, — she replied, cheerfcl'y. Xwtjr reT hwf.iies hope of something better in the minds people; it's not the same thin?, with those wh-j have past the meridian. But Kitry had special reason for deal ring some new departure, me break in the routine existence which should divert her thoughts from the r.isf that had her. think she hare wv-Uvsned a spell minor to srimulste her faculties and prevent her mind t>rooduig. sent an the ' Era" to in the "out eoDar- columns, and Iwrote also to my areut in Blaokfnar<-road, but nothini- came of these appticati ns, a the end our short season with slarming rapidity, at Hull feU in with Mr. Baker's Old English Comedy Company. In this comjamy was an old friend outs, Mrs. — Vincent. Off and I had known her nre she was a alip of girt playing Arvl Old Sadler's Wells, and now her size and rears only permitted her t take surh frts Ju'ie-'s nurse Mrs. HarJcaa'le. B'it better Mrs. HarlciMtle never the boards, she waa rood a woman as ever honest, outand kind hearted; a kttle dressy perhaps, but with grwd deal of common sense in her head for all that. As soon as I told her how we were situated, she promised speak to Baker behalf Kitty, their MisHardcaetle was piring herself airs, snd pretending that she stayed to oblige. Well, the upshot of t-his was that Bakeir called upon the fallowing morning, and offered Kitty a six weeks- engagement, a wek axxl the usual expenses. however, that he could offer me nothing, ss the ermpany would be to the first week m and he should ta':a no but trust t> what could find there in the way musar. At this Kitty Ilooked at each other ruefully, and she once said that she must take time to reflect Baker said shouH leaving the next day, whereupon Ipromised should have our decision that evening, and went away. The losing Kitty for six weeks was very me, for up this we hod never been parted for more than a few days at a time she had been undT my protection; but Ifall that now I must sink all selfish considerations for the soke of the poor girl. I1 kti' that she had long wanted Ireland make herself acquainted with Irish dialect and character, and was dear that the sea-trip snd the chaacr- of scene and society would do her good. In to this, Ifelt that the companionship a cheerful and woman like Mrs. St. Vincent, who I was perfectly aure would take charge her like a mother, must hsve far more beneficial effert upon her mint. ti. anything a sombre old fellow my sort could off. the way consolation. Iput the moat i. face could on the affair, and meeting the objection.- she raised my behalf by declaring thsyt I shou. triad little holiday visit mr brother, Iind u_ her to sign agreement with Baker that evening f the Irish tour. Mrs. St. Vin-lit expressed the greatest delight with this promoted me that Kitty not go out her she brought her bank to me. Thut was little impor however, for Kitty I knew was quite able take cars and might fully trusted to do what rigtt matter wliat should be. I could see that Kitty was greatly pleased with this arrangement, though he- affectionate heart was saddenei whinever the idea my solitude occurred to her. cant bear to think that you will alone, " she said, with tears in her eyes. set her mind at ea. point Iwrele to mv brother Charlea, telling him that Iproposed to spend few weeks with him at I'eckham, and a reply to the effect that hiv house was always open to me, Iprotended to highly elated by the his invitation presented higiliving and general jollification. This required a good deal of pretence, for besides the fact that my brother's invitation was anything but cordial, I knew that Charles, being dyspeptic and abstemious and frugal in the matter of diet, and having a serious turn of mind, devoted the few hours of relaxation which business permitted to open-air preaching on Wandsworth Common.

Kitty knew this, for ahe was hardly leas delighted than Iwhen, just the moment, I got an to conduct the band at Scarborough during th -4ed, and the moral obstacle casrte to me now nvrv than ewr. In addition this, the tone Kitty's V led to think that she waa slowly surely getting Jack out of thoughts. There was not despondent wonl in and thouga it was possible that she wrote cheerfully order to allay anxiety my part, I could not conceive her arriting in this spirit day afbr day the loas of her lover weighed heavily her heart. Iommdered it advisable to show these letter- to Jack, in that might draw his own them, and undeceive himself with regard to feelings. to my expectations, instead of being oast down, he was decidedly exhilarated reading them. "There's capital healthy ring about her letters, " said; fc can see that eats and sleeps weU. and enjoys like a dear, rational, clear-headed little ahe is. There's not morbid thought in her mind. Look here, old man, if you screw a string on your fiddle too tight it will out note; that's just what happened with Kitty. Her mi-nd was overstrung with mental strain and and the objections raised the grevd- equality were the result. The strain has passed her mind has returned to its and it will all come right in the end." "You're wrong, Jack, your wrong, " I said, warningilT. "Not I, " replied, laughing with snap of his fingers. "Wait till she comes back." Ikept her portrait the chimoey-picce atting-room, which was very gorgeous with alabaster ornaments under glass shades, and each end Jack called this the domestic altar, and every afternoon brought a fresh flower, and set it in the little vase beetle the phototrraph; and surely worAipper at shrine ever looked with deeper devotion ami adoration at his saint than Jack at the portrait his sweetheart. "llow's Jooci?" Jaok asked morning, when we met. "He's getting about again. He talks about coming back again to work next week." "I'm glad to hear that, for Igo to Chester about Monday or Tuesday at the latest. There's some to done which cannot be postponed longer. Ar.d if you're out of eugagenn-nt you may be liud enough to help me through with the affair." " Ishall be only too happy, if it's in power to help you." "There's doubt about that — you have just the methodical habits Ilack. Something must be done about the vicarage. My built the house, and it's my property now. The new Vicir won't have it; he prefers the old Vicaraare. admire his taste, though Iregret I wouldn't live the giooxny, ugly place for anything. It gives me the doldrums every time Ilook at it. At the same time it cannot left tenaniless. The house agent ssys he might find purchaser if Iput st for sale before the end August. That means the furniture must be disposed of at once. 4 Sell the lot by auction, ' Iwrote to the man, and repliea that will do ao soon haa a list the family effects which Iwish to reserve. Newer thought that Of course, there are lot's thiatgs thst respectable grandson ought not to part with. That'a a job Inever get through single-handed. haven't pocket that isn't bulged out of all shape with old letters, simphr because Inever make up my mind which to burn said which to keep. It would be just the same thing with this house full | furniture. Years hence Imight be found the midst of ths lumber coated with dust and festooned with cobwebs from sheer inability make the first move." promiied un hi- Iran this fate; and Jones on parade in the afternoon Ilearnt that would certainly be able dispense with my serooes by the following Wednesday. "Then Ishall wait till Wednesday, " said Jack, when told him.But Jack, — said I, "have you settled what sou are going with the effects too reserve?" "Dear me. Inever thought of that, 9 exclaimed. "It don't matter much if you forget roar fish basket when go out for day's angling, for you're likely enraigh get fish to put in it: but "this case different, the' fish there, and we must put it in something. By the bye, old man, are you fond fishing?" "There's nothing Ilike better, " said I. " Then) ought to be some decent sport on the Dee. 11l remember that anyhow. In order save time left me Monday with view to finding storehouse for the furniture, and on Wednesday morning wrote telling me that had taken an mill house the Dee for that purpose, ami asking to let him know by telegraph at what hour Iarrive at Chester. The idea of his taking old miULhouse to store a few pieces fornitare amused though it did not greatly astonish me, for becudes being unpractical, waa unthrifty an extreme, and seemed not to laow the value money. He met me on the platform st Chester the afternoon, and giving my portmanteau to a porter, took me outside, where a neat little trap was standing. ''Jump in, old chsp, " said he. "We've eight nine miles to go, but the little mare's beauty." "Bight or nine miles!" I exclaimed, sapping into the trap. "Yes, " said be, laughing at my amasement, as took his sent beside me. "We're going my honae!" "The old mill you spoke of?" "That's it. The old place yon aver saw. and I got it the luckiest chance in the workL Ij went straight to the house agent Monday and told 1 him what I wanted, mug quarters, good and j a good way from St. Botolph's and the railway. put me up to this place, which has been let to an artist and' hs familv good souk, cleared out last: week. saw it, liked it, an-J as it for sal-, Ibought bj use, meadow, weir, furniture, linen, crockery — tne lot." it?" I exclaimed, redoubled astonishment "Well, at any rate didn't take lung make your mind in that matter.'' You see, could find no argument buying it." "But the outlay. Jack." "That was not great, and I had the assurance my house agent that it was bargain." lie look at me m-ith smile his fans, and continued in his soft, kind 4 Fools sni their soon parted ' is thst what you were j Pick? Well, money ban not brought much happiness' chst I should cling to tenaciously, and this little 1 not altogether piece thoughtless] fol'v. Whatever happena it will pWtsact to have: a little hose down to now and then, to work out an idea, idle away a few with the go-as-youplssae and do-as-you-like feeling which is not to had bote'." 4 Why, that's true. Jack, " I said, "and there's another advautage yon have not enumerated, but which. Iwager, you did not overlook in the transaction — and that is the pleasure you can give to an old friend out of collar." I had not forgotten what hid between with regard to fishing, nor be either. hour's smart drive brought the brow th& hill overlooking the river, and throujrh break the trees Jack pointed out a many-gabled red-brick house by the- water-ride, aid told me that was his mill. was most picturesque and charming the ere. even at that distance. "Ha, that's a real old Englia'u house, " said I, "and none your modern antiques." "And, consequently, '' replied Jack, "there's mt level bit flooring Irum kitchen to cock-loft, and there's not' a you can without trending; but, the other 1 hand, there's fireplace with a nettle in the kitchen which makes you king for chilly evening; and you can catch trut fn-m the dairy window." Pretty the old house was from a I found it tea more drove the stabile yard, with the the weir in ears, anl the glimpse of an orchard Ride. ti -r garden the other, Umi-gmp the course f the nav nothing things hud white cloth, wtilrii caught o's eye panning the long, open window the A buxom woman curtsey--! to with | good welcoming from the porch, a Lid ran from the orchard to take charge the horse. Why. Jick, " suid I, in low voice, L-ve you managed I to find servants and all a couple days?" They are neighbours who had the letting the place, and locked alter the late tenant-, and well, they threw themseJvca in with the lot.- j My room w- a real picture, and, indeed, everything about the place was

[TO BE CONTINUED]

[BNA: Link.]

Also

Liverpool Weekly Courier — Saturday 3 September 1892 target="_blank">Link.]

[BNA: Link.]


London Evening Standard — Monday 12 September 1892" target="_blank">Link.]

LABOUR MOVEMENTS . . . .

A meeting of the Navvies and Bricklayers' Labourers' Union was held yesterday at the corner of Chatham- road, Wandsworth Common, to organise the large number of men engaged in the building trade residing in that locality. A resolution calling upon all unskilled labourers to at ence join their Union was carried unanimously.

[BNA: Link.]


South Western Star — Saturday 12 November 1892

The enlargement of Wandsworth Common by the throwing into the "Railway Enclosure Piece," which originally formed part of the Common, is a very desirable object and one to which I hope the wall extend the most sympathetic 47,50, is the sum required and the hope to from the Battersea Vestry, from dos Wandsworth Board of Works, half the purchase mosey from the London County Council, and the remainder by public subscription. Everythrig which tends to make the locality more attractive pays lv. the long ma, and thousand pounds expender in ill way all find its way back again in ratft largely it. creased by the fact that there are few empty in the parish llcreover, the value of property bermes and the rateable value in proportion. It pays to have open spaces and stir ctive commons, and ig only from that point of view the project is worth supporting.

[BNA: Link.]


London Evening Standard — Friday 18 November 1892

OPEN SPACES.

At the Board of Works for the Wandsworth District, Mr. B. Wise presiding, the clerk (Mr. H. G. Hills) reported the receipt of a letter from the secretary of the Wandsworth Common Protection Association in favour of the acquisition of the "railway enclosure piece (adjoining Wandsworth common Railway-station), with the view to its restoration to the common, stating that the price asked for the five acres by the trustees of the late Mr. Anderson Rose is 7500/. The matter was referred to the General Purposes Committee for consideration and report.

[BNA: Link.]

"18921112" target="_blank">Link.]


London Evening Standard — Friday 18 November 1892" target="_blank">Link.]

OPEN SPACES. The Trustees of the London Parochial Charities have made a further grant of 1000/. towards the purchase of the Paddington Recreation Ground, in addition to the sum of 1000 t. already promised. The grant is conditional on the remainder of the money C4BOl. out of a total of 50,8801.) being forthcoming, and on the passing of the Bill.

At the Board of Works for the Wandsworth District, Mr. B. Wise presiding, the clerk (Mr. H. G. Hills) reported the receipt of a letter from the secretary of the Wandsworth Common Protection Association in favour of the acquisition of the "railway enclosure piece (adjoining Wandsworth common Railway-station), with the view to its restoration to the common, stating that the price asked for the five acres by the trustees of the late Mr. Anderson Rose is 7500/. The matter was referred to the General Purposes Committee for consideration and report

At the Plumstead District Board of Works yesterday, Colonel Hughes, M.P.. L.C.C., reported that the London County Council had completed the purchase of Bostal Wood, and the Plumstead parish could now arrange to open it at any time.

[BNA: Link.]


South Western Star — Saturday 26 November 1892" target="_blank">Link.]

POSTAL FACILITIES NEAR IT. . — . . . The IA orks Committee brought up a report stating that they had received a letter from Mr. H. De la Hooke. Clerk to the Landon ( malty Coancil, stating that the Post Office anthorities had applied for per mission to place a pillar letter-box on Wandsworth Common near ht jarnes's-road. On the 54th Sep. (ember last the committee recommended that a similar application of the district postmaster should not be conceded on account of the narrowness of the footway, and were of opinion that a writable position for the box would be by the side of the paved foot Ipath crossing the Common. They therefore that the Council be informed accordingly The recopsmendaticei was adopted.

[BNA: Link.]


Wallington & Carshalton Herald — Saturday 17 December 1892 target="_blank">Link.]

PROPOSED RESTORATION TO WANDSWORTH COMMON

A letter has been received by the General Purposes Committee from the Wandsworth Common Protection Association. in favour of the acquisition of the Railway Enclosure (adjoining Wandsworth Common railway station) with the view of its restoration to the Common.

The pries asked for the 5 acres wan 7,500, and it was suggested that the Board of Works should contribute l,000.

On the recommendation of the committee it was resolved that the he informed that the piece of land in question not being within the district of the Board, and having regard to its position and the extent of open spaces in the locality, the Board declined to make any contribution towards the cost of acquring it.

[BNA: Link.]

18921217


South London Press — Saturday 31 December 1892" target="_blank">Link.]

Wandsworth Common. The District have refused to contribute towards the purchase of five acres, near the Surrey Tavern, Wandsworth Common, which the London County Council propose to acquire. Battersea Vestry declined to contribute 1000 towards the purchase of the piece of land adjoining the railway station, Wandsworth Common, for the use the public.

[BNA: Link.]

This is the Railway Extension Piece [james Anderson Rose's land]

1892-12-31-SouthLondonPress-31dec1892.png"18921231" target="_blank">Link.]